🌱 Help Us Grow

Your feedback fuels the future of viaSocket.šŸ’”

Share what you love, what’s missing, or what feels off - we’re listening. Every word shapes what comes next.✨

If you want to request a plug or modification in plugs, visit https://viasocket.com/integrations

Trending
  1. Add a drag-to-delete bin in Flow builder to make deleting actions faster and more intuitive.

    Deleting actions in a flow currently requires clicking small delete icons, which is slow and breaks the visual workflow. Add a trash bin in the bottom-left of the flow canvas where users can drag any action to delete it instantly. Also show a temporary Undo button after deletion so mistakes can be quickly reverted. This will make flow editing much faster and smoother, especially when users are rearranging or cleaning up large flows.

    aryamansoni999@gmail.com

    0

  2. MCP UI overlap

    When testing an MCP, the test window sometimes appears on the screen and stays there, causing the UI to overlap.

    shreyas a

    0

  3. Intimation and Loading Animation when user clicks something

    When a button or a process is initiated, a lot of time, there is no intimation or loading animation shown to the user, even though the process is running in the background. This causes multiple clicks of a button, which leads to multiple requests in some cases.

    shreyas a

    0

  4. SaaS Verification Checkbox with Database Update and App Badge

    I want an option in the visibility section that says ā€œSaaS Verified and Listedā€, where I can tick a checkbox once my app gets listed. When I check this box, it should automatically update in the database (reflecting the app’s verified status), and on the integration page, a verified symbol (like a checkmark or badge) should appear next to the app name.

    Devesh S

    1

  5. Version Control in viaSocket with revert on Version similar like github

    My suggestion for viaSocket enhancement is to introduce a version control system in flows, similar to GitHub or Google Docs. Use case: If a user updates an existing flow and later realizes that the previous one was better, there should be an easy option to revert/restore to the previous version. Each flow should maintain a version history with details like timestamp and who made the changes. This would make both debugging and rollback much easier. Example: Suppose I created a flow that handles customer form submissions. If I accidentally delete some actions in it, I should just be able to click ā€œRevert to Version - [Date/Time]ā€ and restore the earlier stable flow. I believe this enhancement will make viaSocket more powerful and user-friendly.

    Harshita_Shinde

    0

  6. Video Upload and scheduling for longer videos.

    Need support for the longer video on Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and YouTube. The video will be sent to the queue process and processed it and then the flow will be in paused once the process completes; the flow continues.

    Royston Sanctis

    0

  7. App Search Requires Page Refresh

    In DH, whenever I search for an app it doesn’t show the results until it refreshes the whole page.

    Devesh S

    1

  8. A 2-way sync capability between platforms via API.

    This would really help clients ya fir users who use multiple tools and hate manually updating information in each one. With 2-way sync, changes in one app would automatically reflect in the others, saving time, avoiding mistakes, and making workflows way smoother. It would be especially useful for anyone choosing between viaSocket or any other automation tools (Zapier, n8n, Make, etc).

    Om G

    0

  9. Keep Flow Open and Show AI Tab on workflow window.

    When we click Take Help with AI, the flow should remain open. The AI tab should open on the left side of the screen. Currently, the flow minimizes instead, which breaks the continuity of work because you lose the view of the flow.

    swapnil s

    2

  10. Handling Long Processing Times for Image/Video Generation Plugins.

    When we create plugins for apps that generate images or videos, the processing time often depends on the prompt and can take longer. However, viaSocket has a 30-second response limit, which causes an error due to this time gap and delayed response.

    Diksha P

    0

  11. Add ā€œBack to folderā€ navigation in workflow view

    When working inside a workflow (e.g., Folder A → Workflow 1) there’s no quick way to go back to the folder’s workflow list — the only option is to return to the home page. This forces extra clicks, breaks flow, and slows down switching between workflows in the same folder.

    Dipak

    0

  12. viasocket help should be passed from the backend

    viasocket help should be passed from the backend as it is required in every sample data of each trigger

    HARSH G

    1

  13. Inbuit form submission trigger

    This trigger allows users to create and customize a form directly within the viaSocket. When the form is submitted, it instantly activates the flow and passes the submitted data for further processing—enabling easy collection and automation of actions without manual work.

    Swapnil S

    0

  14. Actions with webhook url

    There are actions which includes callback url as input parameter and responds to the url(webhook url) when a task is completed For ex, in scraping when the scrapping is completed the api sends respond to webhook url

    HARSH G

    0

  15. Make ā€œPlugin Nameā€ and ā€œUse Caseā€ required in the Request an App form, and rename ā€œPlugin Nameā€ to ā€œApp Nameā€ for clarity.

    When users click on ā€œRequest an Appā€ in the Integration page, a form opens to collect details for new app integrations. Currently, it allows submission even if the ā€œPlugin Nameā€ and ā€œUse Caseā€ fields are empty, leading to incomplete requests and confusion. These fields should be made mandatory, and if a user tries to submit the form without filling them, a clear validation popup should appear indicating that both ā€œPlugin Nameā€ and ā€œUse Caseā€ are required before submission. Also, the field label ā€œPlugin Nameā€ should be changed to ā€œApp Name.ā€ When users click on ā€œRequest an Appā€ and then see a field labeled ā€œPlugin Name,ā€ it can cause confusion since they are expecting to request an app, not a plugin. Renaming it to ā€œApp Nameā€ will make the form wording consistent with the action the user is taking, making it clearer and more user-friendly.

    Prashant J

    0